Python source code file encoding

PEP 263 – Defining Python Source Code Encodings

This PEP proposes to introduce a syntax to declare the encoding of a Python source file. The encoding information is then used by the Python parser to interpret the file using the given encoding. Most notably this enhances the interpretation of Unicode literals in the source code and makes it possible to write Unicode literals using e.g. UTF-8 directly in an Unicode aware editor.

Problem

In Python 2.1, Unicode literals can only be written using the Latin-1 based encoding “unicode-escape”. This makes the programming environment rather unfriendly to Python users who live and work in non-Latin-1 locales such as many of the Asian countries. Programmers can write their 8-bit strings using the favorite encoding, but are bound to the “unicode-escape” encoding for Unicode literals.

Proposed Solution

I propose to make the Python source code encoding both visible and changeable on a per-source file basis by using a special comment at the top of the file to declare the encoding.

To make Python aware of this encoding declaration a number of concept changes are necessary with respect to the handling of Python source code data.

Defining the Encoding

Python will default to ASCII as standard encoding if no other encoding hints are given.

To define a source code encoding, a magic comment must be placed into the source files either as first or second line in the file, such as:

or (using formats recognized by popular editors):

#!/usr/bin/python # vim: set fileencoding= : 

More precisely, the first or second line must match the following regular expression:

The first group of this expression is then interpreted as encoding name. If the encoding is unknown to Python, an error is raised during compilation. There must not be any Python statement on the line that contains the encoding declaration. If the first line matches the second line is ignored.

To aid with platforms such as Windows, which add Unicode BOM marks to the beginning of Unicode files, the UTF-8 signature \xef\xbb\xbf will be interpreted as ‘utf-8’ encoding as well (even if no magic encoding comment is given).

If a source file uses both the UTF-8 BOM mark signature and a magic encoding comment, the only allowed encoding for the comment is ‘utf-8’. Any other encoding will cause an error.

Examples

These are some examples to clarify the different styles for defining the source code encoding at the top of a Python source file:

With interpreter binary and using Emacs style file encoding comment:

#!/usr/bin/python # -*- coding: latin-1 -*- import os, sys . #!/usr/bin/python # -*- coding: iso-8859-15 -*- import os, sys . #!/usr/bin/python # -*- coding: ascii -*- import os, sys . 

# This Python file uses the following encoding: utf-8 import os, sys . 

#!/usr/local/bin/python # coding: latin-1 import os, sys . 

#!/usr/local/bin/python import os, sys . 

#!/usr/local/bin/python # latin-1 import os, sys . 

#!/usr/local/bin/python # # -*- coding: latin-1 -*- import os, sys . 

#!/usr/local/bin/python # -*- coding: utf-42 -*- import os, sys . 

Concepts

The PEP is based on the following concepts which would have to be implemented to enable usage of such a magic comment:

1. The complete Python source file should use a single encoding. Embedding of differently encoded data is not allowed and will result in a decoding error during compilation of the Python source code. Any encoding which allows processing the first two lines in the way indicated above is allowed as source code encoding, this includes ASCII compatible encodings as well as certain multi-byte encodings such as Shift_JIS. It does not include encodings which use two or more bytes for all characters like e.g. UTF-16. The reason for this is to keep the encoding detection algorithm in the tokenizer simple.
2. Handling of escape sequences should continue to work as it does now, but with all possible source code encodings, that is standard string literals (both 8-bit and Unicode) are subject to escape sequence expansion while raw string literals only expand a very small subset of escape sequences.
3. Python’s tokenizer/compiler combo will need to be updated to work as follows:
   1. read the file
   2. decode it into Unicode assuming a fixed per-file encoding
   3. convert it into a UTF-8 byte string
   4. tokenize the UTF-8 content
   5. compile it, creating Unicode objects from the given Unicode data and creating string objects from the Unicode literal data by first reencoding the UTF-8 data into 8-bit string data using the given file encoding

   Note that Python identifiers are restricted to the ASCII subset of the encoding, and thus need no further conversion after step 4.

   Implementation

   For backwards-compatibility with existing code which currently uses non-ASCII in string literals without declaring an encoding, the implementation will be introduced in two phases:

   1. Allow non-ASCII in string literals and comments, by internally treating a missing encoding declaration as a declaration of “iso-8859-1”. This will cause arbitrary byte strings to correctly round-trip between step 2 and step 5 of the processing, and provide compatibility with Python 2.2 for Unicode literals that contain non-ASCII bytes. A warning will be issued if non-ASCII bytes are found in the input, once per improperly encoded input file.
   2. Remove the warning, and change the default encoding to “ascii”.

   The builtin compile() API will be enhanced to accept Unicode as input. 8-bit string input is subject to the standard procedure for encoding detection as described above.

   If a Unicode string with a coding declaration is passed to compile() , a SyntaxError will be raised.

   SUZUKI Hisao is working on a patch; see [2] for details. A patch implementing only phase 1 is available at [1].

   Phases

   Implementation of steps 1 and 2 above were completed in 2.3, except for changing the default encoding to “ascii”.

   The default encoding was set to “ascii” in version 2.5.

   Scope

   This PEP intends to provide an upgrade path from the current (more-or-less) undefined source code encoding situation to a more robust and portable definition.

   References

   History

   • 1.10 and above: see CVS history
   • 1.8: Added ‘.’ to the coding RE.
   • 1.7: Added warnings to phase 1 implementation. Replaced the Latin-1 default encoding with the interpreter’s default encoding. Added tweaks to compile() .
   • 1.4 — 1.6: Minor tweaks
   • 1.3: Worked in comments by Martin v. Loewis: UTF-8 BOM mark detection, Emacs style magic comment, two phase approach to the implementation

   Copyright

   This document has been placed in the public domain.

   Источник

   PEP 3120 – Using UTF-8 as the default source encoding

   This PEP proposes to change the default source encoding from ASCII to UTF-8. Support for alternative source encodings (PEP 263) continues to exist; an explicit encoding declaration takes precedence over the default.

   A Bit of History

   In Python 1, the source encoding was unspecified, except that the source encoding had to be a superset of the system’s basic execution character set (i.e. an ASCII superset, on most systems). The source encoding was only relevant for the lexis itself (bytes representing letters for keywords, identifiers, punctuation, line breaks, etc). The contents of a string literal was copied literally from the file on source.

   In Python 2.0, the source encoding changed to Latin-1 as a side effect of introducing Unicode. For Unicode string literals, the characters were still copied literally from the source file, but widened on a character-by-character basis. As Unicode gives a fixed interpretation to code points, this algorithm effectively fixed a source encoding, at least for files containing non-ASCII characters in Unicode literals.

   PEP 263 identified the problem that you can use only those Unicode characters in a Unicode literal which are also in Latin-1, and introduced a syntax for declaring the source encoding. If no source encoding was given, the default should be ASCII. For compatibility with Python 2.0 and 2.1, files were interpreted as Latin-1 for a transitional period. This transition ended with Python 2.5, which gives an error if non-ASCII characters are encountered and no source encoding is declared.

   Rationale

   With PEP 263, using arbitrary non-ASCII characters in a Python file is possible, but tedious. One has to explicitly add an encoding declaration. Even though some editors (like IDLE and Emacs) support the declarations of PEP 263, many editors still do not (and never will); users have to explicitly adjust the encoding which the editor assumes on a file-by-file basis.

   When the default encoding is changed to UTF-8, adding non-ASCII text to Python files becomes easier and more portable: On some systems, editors will automatically choose UTF-8 when saving text (e.g. on Unix systems where the locale uses UTF-8). On other systems, editors will guess the encoding when reading the file, and UTF-8 is easy to guess. Yet other editors support associating a default encoding with a file extension, allowing users to associate .py with UTF-8.

   For Python 2, an important reason for using non-UTF-8 encodings was that byte string literals would be in the source encoding at run-time, allowing then to output them to a file or render them to the user as-is. With Python 3, all strings will be Unicode strings, so the original encoding of the source will have no impact at run-time.

   Implementation

   The parser needs to be changed to accept bytes > 127 if no source encoding is specified; instead of giving an error, it needs to check that the bytes are well-formed UTF-8 (decoding is not necessary, as the parser converts all source code to UTF-8, anyway).

   IDLE needs to be changed to use UTF-8 as the default encoding.

   Copyright

   This document has been placed in the public domain.

   Источник